<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amended CEQA Suit Filed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hbneighbors.com/2010/02/19/first-amended-ceqa-petition-filled-this-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hbneighbors.com/2010/02/19/first-amended-ceqa-petition-filled-this-week/</link>
	<description>Help Protect Huntington Beach - A Coalition Of HB Residents, Business Owners &#38; Groups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Williams</title>
		<link>http://hbneighbors.com/2010/02/19/first-amended-ceqa-petition-filled-this-week/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hbneighbors.com/?p=269#comment-77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We agree with most of your comments and think that removing parking for the bar patrons will force them to park in the city structure. 

The city has a permit parking program in place. Residents need to work with the city to implement it. 

We think that the new downtown plan will make the problems you speak of much much worse with added bars, added restaurants with alcohol and a parking plan that doesn&#039;t create the needed parking spots to support the expansion. We have limited resources and are focusing our attention on the larger issue of fighting the new expanded downtown plan that the city has already approved. We would encourage you to read the suit which talks to and represents some of your points. http://hbneighbors.com/the-ceqa-suit/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We agree with most of your comments and think that removing parking for the bar patrons will force them to park in the city structure. </p>
<p>The city has a permit parking program in place. Residents need to work with the city to implement it. </p>
<p>We think that the new downtown plan will make the problems you speak of much much worse with added bars, added restaurants with alcohol and a parking plan that doesn&#8217;t create the needed parking spots to support the expansion. We have limited resources and are focusing our attention on the larger issue of fighting the new expanded downtown plan that the city has already approved. We would encourage you to read the suit which talks to and represents some of your points. <a href="http://hbneighbors.com/the-ceqa-suit/" rel="nofollow">http://hbneighbors.com/the-ceqa-suit/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancygwilliams</title>
		<link>http://hbneighbors.com/2010/02/19/first-amended-ceqa-petition-filled-this-week/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nancygwilliams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hbneighbors.com/?p=269#comment-65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why aren&#039;t you guys addressing this permit parking program that the city is putting in downtown? I live South of the numbered streets.  I asked around and my neighbors do not want the drunks pushed into our neighborhoods.  If the drunks don&#039;t park in the city lot now, they will not after the numbered streets drive them out.  These drunken 909 partiers are parking on the streets to avoid the 4 cops standing outside the city structure.  They will not park in the lot.  They will park in my neighborhood. I bought my home outside of the numbered streets to avoid these problems.  Now this City program will push the problem into my neighborhood.  THAT IS WRONG!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why aren&#8217;t you guys addressing this permit parking program that the city is putting in downtown? I live South of the numbered streets.  I asked around and my neighbors do not want the drunks pushed into our neighborhoods.  If the drunks don&#8217;t park in the city lot now, they will not after the numbered streets drive them out.  These drunken 909 partiers are parking on the streets to avoid the 4 cops standing outside the city structure.  They will not park in the lot.  They will park in my neighborhood. I bought my home outside of the numbered streets to avoid these problems.  Now this City program will push the problem into my neighborhood.  THAT IS WRONG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HBN Monitor</title>
		<link>http://hbneighbors.com/2010/02/19/first-amended-ceqa-petition-filled-this-week/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HBN Monitor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hbneighbors.com/?p=269#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mark, Great idea! We&#039;ve preceded additional points with &quot;NEW!&quot; on the CEQA page.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, Great idea! We&#8217;ve preceded additional points with &#8220;NEW!&#8221; on the CEQA page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bixby</title>
		<link>http://hbneighbors.com/2010/02/19/first-amended-ceqa-petition-filled-this-week/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Bixby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hbneighbors.com/?p=269#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have skimmed the updated petition.  I see where the January reconsideration action has been added to the timeline, but I&#039;m not seeing any other direct references to the January action.  Can you be more specific on which sections of the petition were updated?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have skimmed the updated petition.  I see where the January reconsideration action has been added to the timeline, but I&#8217;m not seeing any other direct references to the January action.  Can you be more specific on which sections of the petition were updated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

